Re: Murdoch's Falsehoods [Was: Kuchar/McDowell screen on Fox News!]

From: Jerry Tartaglia (email suppressed)
Date: Thu Aug 06 2009 - 04:51:19 PDT


Too late to saddle up, boys! Them varmints have already taken over the
Ranch and raped the sheep. We better head up to the underground caves and
regroup.\

Jerry Tartaglia
http://www.jerry501.com

"To hear with eyes belongs to love's fine wit."(Sonnet 23)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Davidson" <email suppressed>
To: <email suppressed>
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: Murdoch's Falsehoods [Was: Kuchar/McDowell screen on Fox News!]

> I'm with you! Let's get a posse together. Come on Fred, saddle up!
> We're going on a FOX hunt.
>
> ---------fred davids0n
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Tony Conrad wrote:
>
>> Wake up!
>>
>> I agree with Gregg Biermann. Fox is the ENEMY; the ENEMY; the ENEMY.
>>
>> Not that your slushy liberalism is going to have any effect (except
>> stiffening the spines of some of us who see things more clearly), but
>> your remarks certainly represent the final disintegration of
>> "experimental" into complete meaninglessness. "Art" as well, it
>> appears.........
>>
>> -----t0ny
>>
>>
>> On Wed 08/05/09 1:47 PM , Lundgren email suppressed sent:
>>> I think the clip is an experimental film in it's own sense.
>>>
>>> We should always have a wide definition of art, and we should try to
>>> interprete any work of art as a good work of art.
>>>
>>> Therefore I see no other thing to do than to consider this a really
>>> great
>>> experimental satire.
>>>
>>> Björn Lundgren
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Scott Stark" BEAM.NET>To: email suppressed>Sent:
>>> Monday, August 03, 2009 9:15 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Murdoch's Falsehoods [Was: Kuchar/McDowell screen on Fox
>>> News!]
>>>
>>>> At 06:19 PM 8/2/2009 -0700, Chuck Kleinhans
>>> wrote:>
>>>>> They also seem to not grasp the fact that the
>>> film was made in 1975 and is >>not being funded by the NEA.
>>>>
>>>> Actually I think they were very carefully
>>> creating this confusion. If you > listen closely they do state that the
>>> funding
>>> went to the "theater" that > was planning to show the film, not the
>>> film
>>> itself, but that goes by very > quickly and they made sure to blur that
>>> distinction with the "shocking" > imagery and voice-over details.
>>>>
>>>> I think the Fox team is actually very smart and
>>> crafty, and has a lot of > fun making stuff up.
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________> For
>>> info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at
>>> om>.>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________
>>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at om>.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________
>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.

__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.