From: Fred Davidson (email suppressed)
Date: Wed Aug 05 2009 - 20:13:14 PDT
I'm with you! Let's get a posse together. Come on Fred, saddle
up! We're going on a FOX hunt.
On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Tony Conrad wrote:
> Wake up!
> I agree with Gregg Biermann. Fox is the ENEMY; the ENEMY; the ENEMY.
> Not that your slushy liberalism is going to have any effect (except
> stiffening the spines of some of us who see things more clearly),
> but your remarks certainly represent the final disintegration of
> "experimental" into complete meaninglessness. "Art" as well, it
> On Wed 08/05/09 1:47 PM , Lundgren email suppressed sent:
>> I think the clip is an experimental film in it's own sense.
>> We should always have a wide definition of art, and we should try to
>> interprete any work of art as a good work of art.
>> Therefore I see no other thing to do than to consider this a really
>> experimental satire.
>> Björn Lundgren
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Scott Stark" BEAM.NET>To: email suppressed>Sent:
>> Monday, August 03, 2009 9:15 PM
>> Subject: Re: Murdoch's Falsehoods [Was: Kuchar/McDowell screen on Fox
>>> At 06:19 PM 8/2/2009 -0700, Chuck Kleinhans
>>>> They also seem to not grasp the fact that the
>> film was made in 1975 and is >>not being funded by the NEA.
>>> Actually I think they were very carefully
>> creating this confusion. If you > listen closely they do state that
>> the funding
>> went to the "theater" that > was planning to show the film, not the
>> itself, but that goes by very > quickly and they made sure to blur
>> distinction with the "shocking" > imagery and voice-over details.
>>> I think the Fox team is actually very smart and
>> crafty, and has a lot of > fun making stuff up.
>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at
>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at om>.
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.