From: MARLON GONZALEZ (email suppressed)
Date: Mon Aug 06 2007 - 11:47:10 PDT
Is there any way you guys can continue talking about this off list? i agree
that this proposed film and photo law is garbage but every 2 seconds
everyone's inbox is full with back and fourth conversation. New York City
will do what it wants and we will all do what we've always done when there's
a law that's unfair- break it. So shoot and run- and that's it. case closed
until the next stupid law.
>From: flick harrison <email suppressed>
>Reply-To: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed>
>To: email suppressed
>Subject: Re: protest nyc's proposed film and photo law
>Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:19:14 -0700
>On 5-Aug-07, at 6:54 PM, Jim Carlile wrote:
>>If they'd had permits and notification, there would not have been a
>>problem for them. If those students wanted to shoot a public service
>>announcement with TOY guns, there's nothing wrong with that. That's what
>>they did-- it was an assignment for a film production class
>So now it's permits AND notification, but nevermind that.
>Your examples of cases in which it might be reasonable to require permits
>are in no way refutations of the many examples in which it is NOT
>reasonable to require permits. The ones do not counter the others.
>If you're waving guns on the street, obviously you should have permits or
>some system of calming the public down.
>But a public performance involving guns BUT NOT involving cameras isn't
>covered by the new rules.
>So, any other examples?
>* FLICK's WEBSITE:
>* BLOG / NEWS:
>For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place!
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.