From: 40 Frames (email suppressed)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2007 - 17:47:57 PST
Either you are meaning to re-post the messages of others, or your comments
(which I'm expecting to appear with these messages) are not coming
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Joost Rekveld wrote:
>> i don't remember ever seeing a discussion on frameworks being
>> 'censored' because it was too much about video. I don't actually
>> remember any discussion here being 'censored', or is my memory too
>> selective ?
>> On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:28 , Brook Hinton wrote:
>>> At this late stage, if video is not treated as just another
>>> cinematic tool on this list, then this list is about a format (or
>>> rather group of formats), not about an approach to making cinema.
>>> That will chase away many who might actually have something to
>>> contribute to discussions on, say, 16mm film preservation or hand-
>>> processing techniques. While such areas are important and will of
>>> course remain a crucial part of Frameworks regardless, a format
>>> limited discussion of avant-garde cinema that excludes video is by
>>> definition, in 2007, a discussion that censors half of its
>>> subject, destroying its relevance and worthiness.
425 SE 3rd, #400
Portland, OR 97214
+1 503 231 6548
Skype ID: frames40
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.