From: owen (email suppressed)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2007 - 17:46:02 PST
On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Joost Rekveld wrote:
> i don't remember ever seeing a discussion on frameworks being
> 'censored' because it was too much about video. I don't actually
> remember any discussion here being 'censored', or is my memory too
> selective ?
>
> friendly,
>
> Joost.
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:28 , Brook Hinton wrote:
>
>> At this late stage, if video is not treated as just another
>> cinematic tool on this list, then this list is about a format (or
>> rather group of formats), not about an approach to making cinema.
>> That will chase away many who might actually have something to
>> contribute to discussions on, say, 16mm film preservation or hand-
>> processing techniques. While such areas are important and will of
>> course remain a crucial part of Frameworks regardless, a format
>> limited discussion of avant-garde cinema that excludes video is by
>> definition, in 2007, a discussion that censors half of its
>> subject, destroying its relevance and worthiness.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Joost Rekveld
> ----------- http://www.lumen.nu/rekveld
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> "Two dangers threaten the world - order and disorder."
> (Paul Valéry)
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.