Re: HH - response

From: Cari Machet (email suppressed)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2007 - 09:39:17 PST

did u mean canonize?
(saint jack)

and changing the header is so just academic
(par for this list)
just bcause someone asked doesn't mean everyone has to bow
isn't that the sort of thing u where arguing about in the first place jack?
(lets not even talk about what ur doing being like what ur complaining about
- or worse
- telling people how they should feel/ reacte...)
just bcause ur having post traumatic stress fr: the wake of the death of
doesn't mean ur response to others response to death
has to also have post traumatic stress tendencies
and anyway
i super think u miss the point of most peoples unhappiness regarding the
it is a reaction to an injustice
much is questioned
(people that r 'good' die and people that r monstrous live on etc....)

also using ur 'conclusion' that was oh so perfect to detour all ur bashing
of freya
i am sorry but ur not dealing w/ third graders (or dogs) here but...

i have said it b4 and will again i assume
- jack is bad -

maybe u could analyze ur patriarchal tendencies
(which include not apologizing or ever admitting u could possibly b wrong in
some way)
and possibly tie them into some real problems that have been constructed by
such tendencies
and maybe change


On 1/23/07, amanda christie <email suppressed> wrote:
> thank you jack, for chaning the title of the thread.
> much appreciated.
> i don't mind following the discussion now.
> amanda
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.

For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.