From: albert alcoz (email suppressed)
Date: Mon Sep 13 2010 - 08:24:04 PDT
133 by Bonet and Balcells is exactly the work i'm studying
under the definition found footage structural film,
even if the term is not useful at all.
I'll check the film by LeGrice.
De: Pablo Marin <email suppressed>
Para: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed>
Enviado: dom,12 septiembre, 2010 23:26
Asunto: Re: [Frameworks] found footage structural films
Surfacing on the Thames, also by Rimmer.
Film in which there appear..., by Landow.
Little Dog for Roger, by Le Grice
133, by Balcells/Bonet
maybe some of the Austrian, like Arnold (Passage à l'acte), Tscherkassky
(Manufraktur; Outer Space), Deutsch (Film ist.) or Kubelka's work, could enter
--- On Sun, 9/12/10, albert alcoz <email suppressed> wrote:
>From: albert alcoz <email suppressed>
>Subject: [Frameworks] found footage structural films
>To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" <email suppressed>
>Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 6:09 PM
>I'm writing a dissertation about experimental cinema
>and I have been doing a research about structural films that uses
>Some of the films i have found are:
>Eureka by Ernie Gehr, Tom Tom the Piper's Son by Ken Jacobs and
>Variations on a Cellophane Wrapper by David Rimer.
>Can someone add some other films?
>Is it right to talk about them as "found footage structural films"?
>Does it make any sense?
>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks mailing list