Re: [Frameworks] found footage structural films

From: albert alcoz (email suppressed)
Date: Mon Sep 13 2010 - 08:24:04 PDT


Thanks Pablo. 133 by Bonet and Balcells is exactly the work i'm studying under the definition found footage structural film, even if the term is not useful at all. I'll check the film by LeGrice. Best, Albert ________________________________ De: Pablo Marin <email suppressed> Para: Experimental Film Discussion List <email suppressed> Enviado: dom,12 septiembre, 2010 23:26 Asunto: Re: [Frameworks] found footage structural films Albert, Surfacing on the Thames, also by Rimmer. Film in which there appear..., by Landow. Little Dog for Roger, by Le Grice 133, by Balcells/Bonet maybe some of the Austrian, like Arnold (Passage l'acte), Tscherkassky (Manufraktur; Outer Space), Deutsch (Film ist.) or Kubelka's work, could enter that description. best, pablo (bs. as.) --- On Sun, 9/12/10, albert alcoz <email suppressed> wrote: >From: albert alcoz <email suppressed> >Subject: [Frameworks] found footage structural films >To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" <email suppressed> >Date: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 6:09 PM > > >Hi, > >I'm writing a dissertation about experimental cinema >and I have been doing a research about structural films that uses >found footage. > >Some of the films i have found are: > >Eureka by Ernie Gehr, Tom Tom the Piper's Son by Ken Jacobs and >Variations on a Cellophane Wrapper by David Rimer. > >Can someone add some other films? > >Is it right to talk about them as "found footage structural films"? > >Does it make any sense? > >Thanks, > >Albert Alcoz >http://visionary-film.blogspot.com/ > > >-----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > >_______________________________________________ >FrameWorks mailing list >email suppressed >http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >


_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks