From: Raymond Salvatore Harmon (email suppressed)
Date: Mon Dec 15 2008 - 15:16:54 PST
Jaime
Apologies if I was misunderstood. I quite liked your piece and did not make reference to it at all, I was simply making a statement in defense of VJing as an artform. I used the term 'mediocre' simply to define what James was implying was bad about VJ art in general and was not speaking of your work at all.
Again, sorry you misunderstood my intentions.
Yours
Raymond Salvatore Harmon
raymondharmon.com
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:27:41 +0000
From: jaime cleeland
Subject: Re: VJ art
--0-1121360392-1229380061=:87642
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Maybe Raymond Salvatore Harmon's slight snobbery would only see my efforts =
as mediocre.=C2=A0 All the same feel free to have a play & cut-up with:
=C2=A0
http://www.archive.org/details/EthnomitePux-imagesCollectionVol.4
=C2=A0
=C2=A0
_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_speed_122008
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.