From: Lundgren (email suppressed)
Date: Tue Jun 27 2006 - 14:16:21 PDT
This is a very interesting discussion. :)
I think that the term "film" is far beyond the material context.
Otherwise we would have a really complex situation when a DVD-version (or
VHS, LD, HD...) of a film wouldn't be a film. Surely it _is_ only a
re-presentation (and a manipulated one, more or less depending on the
format), but that is what cinema has allways been (and there's allways a
certain degree of manipulation).
----- Original Message -----
From: "k. a.r." <email suppressed>
To: <email suppressed>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 9:16 PM
> hey there. somewhere in the barrage of posts, somebody wrote about not
> just calling ourselves filmmakers anymore.
> I think, if you work in film, call yourself a filmmmaker.
> if you work in video, call yourself whatever you think applies, but DON'T
> call yourself a filmmaker.
> One of my co-workers described himself as a "Digital Cinematographer" ,
> and stated adamently that he was NOT a filmmaker because he didnt work
> with film.
> Myself personally, I like to tell people I am an experimental
> (haha, but I really do tell people that......)
> Kristie Reinders, B.F.A.
> Director of Cinematography, Electric Visions
> Curator and Head Projectionist, Electric Mural Project
> The Mission, San Francisco, CA
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.