From: db (email suppressed)
Date: Sat Mar 04 2006 - 17:32:38 PST
On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:58 AM, jarrod whaley. wrote:
> I'm not arguing that video is better (it's not worse either, it's
> just different). I'm arguing that it's a fact of life. Ignoring it
> or making pretty speeches about how film should be preserved won't
> make video go away. All that such speeches will accomplish is to
> make the speaker look like a hard-headed cultural Mennonite.
I think you mean Luddite. England would have been a different
country, and the world a different place, if General Ludd had not
been "defeated." Not that this is directly related to film vs
video... it is, however, relevant to historical context.
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.