Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

From: Ken Wood <kenwood_at_uwm.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:14:00 -0600 (CST)

that's pretty cool. Imagine, 32 exposures!
Thanks to everyone for your answers,
Ken

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zachary Iannazzi" <gleanslower_at_gmail.com>
To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" <frameworks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 3:36:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] double exposure



Hope this helps,

someone else posted this chart for multiple exposures here a while ago.




Number of exposure - Number of stops under exposure

1 - 0

2 - 1

3 - 1.5

4 - 2

5 - 2.25

6 - 2.5

7 - 2.75

8 - 3

9 - 3.1

10 - 3.25

11 - 3.35

12 - 3.5

13 - 3.6

14 - 3.75

15 - 3.8

16 - 4

20 - 4.25

24 - 4.5

28 - 4.75

32 - 5

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Steven Gladstone < Steven_at_gladstonefilms.com > wrote:



On 11/9/11 9:03 AM, mike rice wrote:
> its simple, if you think of fstops as doubling or halfing light, then
> yes you would just compensate by stopping down.

I'll add that you have to consider what is being double exposed on, once
you reach white saturation, no additional exposure will develop any
image in there.


-- 
Steven Gladstone 
New York Based Cinematographer 
Gladstone films 
Blog - http://indiekicker.reelgrok.com/ 
http://www.blakehousemovie.com 
http://www.gladstonefilms.com 
917-886-5858 
_______________________________________________ 
FrameWorks mailing list 
FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com 
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks 
_______________________________________________ 
FrameWorks mailing list 
FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com 
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks 


_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Received on Wed Nov 09 2011 - 14:14:06 CST