Yes, a facebook page that allows users to "like" the frameworks list does
seem harmless, but besides publicity (which I am not sure if Frameworks
really needs, but if I am mistaken please say), what does this list really
stand to gain from moving to Facebook?
To John's question about the limits of Gmail: my point was not that Gmail is
the *answer* to the organization flaws in Frameworks, just that there are
other possibilities out there rather than just leeching onto social
networking sites... I guess the point was that the text is all here, it is
my opinion that it should be up to the user (the reader, contributor that
is) to figure out what to do with it, how to comprehend it best.
m
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Fred Camper <f_at_fredcamper.com> wrote:
> Having a Facebook page publicizing FrameWorks seems harmless enough,
> though I might question whether we need new posters who can *only*
> find the list because it's on Facebook.But anyone could make such a
> page, really, and I don't see how anyone else could object. Migrating
> all the discussions to Facebook is, in my opinion, a horrible idea.
> Among other thing, that would mean that they would not be findable via
> search engines, and would be accessible only to those people who join
> Facebook. Plus we might start getting more Facebook style posts --
> pictures of what someone is having for dinner, a new shirt someone
> just bought, the lyrics to an old song posted without any other comment.
>
> Fred Camper
> Chicago
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks_at_jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
Received on Sun Jun 12 2011 - 13:24:56 CDT
