From: Jonathan Thomas (email suppressed)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2011 - 02:43:05 PST
"For me Avant Garde is much more about breaking up the orthodox systems of false
realism in narrative than it is about messing with the material/photography
(which I love too)."
Are they even separate though, especially in terms of motivation? For me, whether
you employ 'systemic' or 'material' etc. investigations, in the end thay are all
different strategies united by the single aim of breaking the illusion of
reality inherent in dominant cinema.
________________________________
From: Jorge Lorenzo Flores Garza <email suppressed>
To: email suppressed
Sent: Thu, 27 January, 2011 1:13:56
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Drama films and the Avant-Garde
Mat Fleming: For me Avant Garde is much more about breaking up the orthodox
systems of false realism in narrative than it is about messing with the
material/photography (which I love too).
I absolutely agree with that because if it is about breaking new ground and
discovering new forms of production, then anything from Jurassic Park to Pixar
is experimental. It is definitely, at least for me too, about breaking systems
of false realism.
And I find interesting what Mat says about the Bourne Ultimatum. I haven't seen
it, but very often in extremely commercial Hollywood productions I see this
pattern of loosing sense of logic and storytelling. I saw a way worst film the
other day: Prince of Persia. It was interesting that at points it didn't matter
who was killing who or even who was who, it was more about the abstract play in
the imagery with all the action-cgi shots. And it makes sense with Jack Smith's
comment about cinema not needing a storyline or anything since it's a purely
visual medium (after analyzing von Sternberg's films).
Jorge L.
________________________________
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:52:53 +0000
From: email suppressed
To: email suppressed
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Drama films and the Avant-Garde
I feel daft as I write this and maybe I was drunk and impressionable when I
first saw it (in fact I know I was) but honestly I thought the Bourne Ultimatum
approached being deserving of being a bit Avant-Garde.
I say this in the sense that it pushes the boundaries formally. It is pure
action from start to finish. I don't think there is a shot in that whole film
that lasts more than 4 or 5 seconds. There are nearly no establishing shots or
interludes while story is developed - story and action are one. And no interlude
for love and all that normal routine. I think the trilogy has changed that kind
of action film forever - Bond looks ridiculous once you've seen Bourne. You can
tell the producers of the last one Quantum of Solace were trying to incorporate
the editing style but they missed the point completely and the film is crap as a
result in my opinion.
I'm not saying it's a great film or anything; thematically it's rubbish and it's
certainly not subversive - which I am always looking for in AG film - but I do
think that it's experimental in a similar way to Hitchcock's formal feature
experiments. And as a result it's exciting on a certain level. For me Avant
Garde is much more about breaking up the orthodox systems of false realism in
narrative than it is about messing with the material/photography (which I love
too).
Mat
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Francisco Torres <email suppressed> wrote:
Inland Empire
Spider
>_______________________________________________
>FrameWorks mailing list
>email suppressed
>http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
email suppressed
http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks