From: email suppressed
Date: Fri Oct 15 2010 - 19:28:10 PDT
Matt: should films that are funded by grants then belong to the awarding body?What about the collaborative nature of filmmaking?
What about filmmakers who are dead and left no estate?
Why is it that some filmmakers anxious to embrace new imaginary and exciting forms of experimental film appear to be beholden to traditional notions of copyright and ownership rather than exploring new ways of distributing and owning work?
Why the emphasis on USA copyright law in so much of this discussion?
On 16/10/2010, at 12:36 PM, Matt Helme wrote:
> People who put in the time and money created and own it. I thought that would go without saying.
FrameWorks mailing list