From: gregg biermann (email suppressed)
Date: Tue Jul 20 2010 - 10:48:15 PDT
I'm not stating that there is no use for film in the present -- only
that mechanical technologies are part of an earlier age than digital
technologies. In that sense they are associated more with the past. That
fits within the discussion about originality -- no?
Pip Chodorov wrote:
> What technologies of the past?
> Photography and film are still technologies of the present (and
> cheaper than digital).
> Was someone discussing typesetting or daguerrotypes?
> -Pip Chodorov
> At 13:26 -0400 20/07/10, gregg biermann wrote:
>> It is
>> interesting though that there has been a consistent, perhaps obsessive
>> interest in the technologies of the past discussed here as this also
>> suggests a retrospective vector.
> FrameWorks mailing list
> email suppressed
FrameWorks mailing list