From: marilyn brakhage (email suppressed)
Date: Wed Oct 21 2009 - 13:38:55 PDT
Begin forwarded message:
> From: marilyn brakhage <email suppressed>
> Date: October 21, 2009 1:35:10 PM PDT (CA)
> To: email suppressed
> Subject: Re: Stan Brakhage Copyrights _Experimental sound-art
>
> Well, I don't think we need to get hung up on a word. . . . I was
> simply acknowledging Peiman's perception of your response as being
> "rude," as he said, and that was certainly one word that could be
> used. But I don't have any problem with direct and vigorous argument.
>
> Just running out of time now, and will have to sign off for awhile.
> (Not to mention, my knowledge of music is fairly limited, so I can't
> really engage fully in that debate anyway.)
>
> Marilyn
>
>
>
> On 20-Oct-09, at 7:26 PM, Tony Conrad wrote:
>
>> Actually I felt I was being direct and harsh, but not really rude.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue 10/20/09 4:38 PM , marilyn brakhage email suppressed sent:
>>> It's a bit late, for me, to be getting this advice. But thanks.
>>>
>>> I get your point though, and furthermore, I've undoubtedly been rude
>>> many times myself -- though I'd prefer not to be.
>>>
>>> Marilyn Brakhage
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20-Oct-09, at 9:32 AM, Tony Conrad wrote:
>>>
>>>> If "rude" is a problem for you, stay
>>> clear of Brakhage! I remember > when he said..........
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.