that sneaky intentional fallacy

From: Chuck Kleinhans (email suppressed)
Date: Fri Mar 27 2009 - 00:46:38 PDT

On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:39 AM, David Tetzlaff wrote:

> partaking in the intentional fallacy may be SOP for experimental
> film enthusiasts, but films always speak for themselves outside of
> their maker(s) intent.
> Jsck Smith did not intend Flaming Creatures to be shocking. he just
> wanted to celebrate glamor in his own way.


For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.