Re: Cameras for Gaza

From: Flick Harrison (email suppressed)
Date: Sat Jan 10 2009 - 12:04:13 PST


Rather than arguing about responsibility, I'll suggest that total full-
on wall-to-wall coverage of both "sides" should end up showing the
truth, n'est-ce pas? Already the entire world media are reporting
from the Israeli lines; world media is banned from Gaza.

I'm just sayin'.

The first casualty of war, etc etc.

* FLICK's WEBSITE & BLOG: http://www.flickharrison.com
* FACEBOOK http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=860700553
* MYSPACE: http://myspace.com/flickharrison

On 10-Jan-09, at 11:50 AM, Shelly Silver wrote:

> 800 palestinians dead
> 14 israelis dead
>
>
> the international red cross accuses israel over 'shocking' gaza
> casualties
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/09/2462040.htm?
> section=world
>
> cameras in gaza are important, along with medical supplies, doctors,
> food...
>
>>> In an effort to bring some balance to the one-sided reporting of
>>> matters, we feel it is imperative to give Palestinians in Gaza &
>>> West Bank a voice at this moment.
>>
>> Don't know what unbalanced "reporting" Alison Fast is watching, but
>> judging by the media reports that show on *my* TV, the side that
>> is not getting a fair reporting and should imperatively be given a
>> voice is the Israelis. They could use these cameras to film, for
>> example, the daily barrages of rockets that have for years been
>> raining upon southern Israel - even during the ceasefire that
>> expired on December 19th.
>>
>>
>> -m
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________
>> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>

__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.