From: Sandra Maliga (email suppressed)
Date: Mon Mar 26 2007 - 12:21:12 PDT
Ah yes, HMWIN is a film ABOUT what she is researching.
I'd say George is still committed but his aesthetic has evolved....
On Mar 25, 2007, at 6:53 PM, db wrote:
> Well, that was my point in saying "This may not be what you are
> looking for, however, since you are seeking accidents."
> As a construct, however, the film not turning out the way the ACTED
> director intended is, I think, why HMWIN fits the model perfectly.
> It's just that, in this case, director's frustration and
> adaptability happen to be one of the threads of the CONSTRUCTED
> film itself.
> In other words, I agree with you that they are/(were?) completely
> committed to their aesthetic.
> On Mar 25, 2007, at 5:47 PM, Sandra Maliga wrote:
>> I'd have to disagree re The Kuchars. They were committed to their
>> esthetic, including wild sync.
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.