Re: Cropping Art -- where is the outrage?

From: Sam Wells (email suppressed)
Date: Fri Sep 22 2006 - 13:54:08 PDT

> In the case of this television show, there is no economic reason
> not to show the work in its original aspect ratio. There's only
> the arrogance and stupidity of the producer of the teevee show to
> blame here.

And no technical reason as Jeff has already pointed out...

>>> Very little of
>>> the non-film work would fit properly into either a 4:3 or 16:9
>>> frame, so
>>> from the get-go there will be a degree of intervention and
>>> distortion in
>>> conveying the work in a conventional broadcast documentary form. pillarbox it.

I suggest we send checks to our local stations during the next
fundraising, letterboxed to 2.35....


For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.