Fwd: Re: labels

From: john porter (email suppressed)
Date: Thu Jun 29 2006 - 22:20:19 PDT

--- john porter <email suppressed> wrote:

Here's the thread Cari. What did you mean by saying
after it all that "distribution is not transmission.
Look up the word"? And which of those 2 words did you
think I didn't know?
We discussed transmission vs "transporting", and
distribution vs "transporting", but not distribution
vs transmission, so I couldn't have even implied that
I thought they're the same thing. I just wanna know
about "transporting"!!

--- Sam Wells <email suppressed> wrote:

traditionally film was _projection_ and video was
you are now transmitting film and projecting video.

(I mean literally you can scan a film send it by
satellite to the other side of the world,
take the data and make a film print if you want).

> To elaborate, you would be scanning a film to create
> a
> VIDEO for transmission, then making a film print
> from
> the transmitted VIDEO.
> You can't transmit film, until they invent those
> Star
> Trek devices ("transponders"?).
> John Porter, Toronto, Canada
> http://www.super8porter.ca/
> email suppressed

> > >--- Cari Machet <email suppressed> wrote:
> > >
> > > transporters
> > > still wouldn't be a transmission

> > No? I don't know how transporters work, but
> > they move a film around the world like they do
> > humans & aliens? That would help film
> >
> > John Porter, Toronto, Canada

John Porter, Toronto, Canada
email suppressed

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.