Re: film ecology

From: db (email suppressed)
Date: Sat Mar 04 2006 - 18:32:23 PST

I agree with you with my head, David, but my heart saddens at the
prospect of either/or choices. They are rarely good in the long run.


On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:08 PM, David Tetzlaff wrote:

> Yeah, I happen to agree that digital can't match
> film light (among other things). But, take all of those things and
> amputate them - say they are gone forever. What is the value of
> what is
> left, even in hand-painted Brakhage though I'm thinking more of
> Maclaine,
> Frampton, Kuchar, Smith (Jack, Harry... Tom, Dick...). Enormous, I
> say. Of
> crucial importance, I say. Should be spread as far as possible by any
> means necessary, I say.

For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.