Re: penquins

From: Sam Wells (email suppressed)
Date: Sat Mar 04 2006 - 14:56:05 PST

> Thus, commercially, the very existence of 16mm camera stock would seem
> to depend exactly on the various forms of digital distribution that
> get people in a snit here.

To some extent that's true. And ?

I don't see why that implies anything much about what to shoot on now,
or even what to present on - for now.

If we're talking about Formal / Experimental cinema we're talking about
a "niche market" if 1956, 1976. 2006, 2016.


For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.