From: Sam Wells (email suppressed)
Date: Sat Oct 29 2005 - 13:53:42 PDT
> the evidence for the prosecution usually rests on the ubiquity of the
> word phallus in Lacan's teaching, ignoring the fact that the phallus
> in his thought is strictly not to be equated with or confused with the
> penis.
What is it, then ? A tripod case ? A submarine ? Or is he just glad to
read the seer ?
-Sam
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.