From: Cari Machet (email suppressed)
Date: Fri Oct 28 2005 - 12:47:09 PDT
--- konrad <email suppressed> wrote:
>
> I bet Alan knows dada fairly well, and his question
> becomes
> interesting to me when interpreted as, "Was dada
> that
> one-pointed as to mean just "kill culture not
> people?" The core
> of the movement was chaos itself, so i don't know
> how it could
> be that 'directed' -- and when it seemed to become
> so, then it
> dissolved into something else (surrealism,
> constructivism).
>
so the part of the manifesto about the bouguasie?
- we'll just ignore that?
it has a history begining in the 1800 w/ millet
through to the creshendo of the 1900-20 period
even the likes of karl andre understood
the inherent death of his art thru commodification
no it didn't 'dissolve' it claimed itself dead
(different)
it was against art for arts sake
it was against'ART'
once it became known as 'ART' it was against itself
no matter if it was made in egypt or france
(the regional dissipation is meaningless
as far as i am concerned)
i would not say that the core was chaos -
chaos was a means to an end -
the end would be the core -
what was the end?
the end was a total reconsrtuction of culture -
how could anyone question THAT as a
no target... blah blah ... not vectorizational
vecterdom vecteredededead?
c
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.