From: Cari Machet (email suppressed)
Date: Tue Oct 18 2005 - 13:35:40 PDT
yes i assumed that as a possibility
jim being negative
i don't think it was actually sarcasm
but a dig/shot yes
but i chose to instead give the information as an
anti-pessimist (which is more than a optimist)
and try to ignor that sad possibility
especially because of your post about us recomending
reading to one another
-guilt-
thanks for the admitance though
"given UR frustration" - you get to???
"leave it at" what???
c
--- James Kreul <email suppressed> wrote:
> My reply was a cheap shot, one I'm already feeling
> guilty about (the Toufic
> hasn't arrived). A slam-dunk cheap shot now might
> involve a tit-for-tat
> book recommendation. One cheap shot seems
> acceptable given my frustration
> in the last thread. Two would be taking things too
> far, and I should follow
> my own advice about contributing to confusion.
>
> So let me simply revise my last post, and we'll
> leave it at that:
>
> I'm confident that any discussion of sarcasm in any
> book will shed light on
> Jim's original question.
>
>
> James Kreul
> UNC-Wilmington
> email suppressed
>
>
> On 10/18/05 12:15 PM, "Cari Machet"
> <email suppressed> wrote:
>
> > what book then?
> >
> > c
> >
> > --- James Kreul <email suppressed> wrote:
> >
> >> Their discussion of sarcasm is also very
> >> instructive...but I don't have the
> >> page at my fingertips.
> >>
> >>
> >> James Kreul
> >> UNC-Wilmington
> >> email suppressed
>
> >>> --- Jim Flannery <email suppressed> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sunday, October 16, 2005, 4:08:53 PM, one
> spoke:
> >>>>
> >>>> C> as i said b4 see deleuze and guattari
> >>>>
> >>>> What page?
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at
> <email suppressed>.
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.