From: Cari Machet (email suppressed)
Date: Sun Oct 16 2005 - 15:50:08 PDT
yes well - that is what i thought but i wasn't sure
of his grumbling
i was speaking very much to the specific people
and their relationship
which if you knew the names
you would understand totally
i wasn't implying anything about all editors in the
industry
and in what we call "the industry" or
"hollywood"
editors (A.C.E.) usually are not filmmakers
in the same sence as they are in the avant garde
nor do they usually claim to b - this one doesn't
anyway
editing is considered it's own art
and the gun desirer is a filmmaker not a director
- he just is -
thanks alot nathan
clearer
c
--- Nathan Andersen <email suppressed> wrote:
> Cari, I assume the disgust regarded the implication
> that editors aren't
> filmmakers. If it were "a director and an editor"
> since those are
> specifically different job functions I'm guessing
> owen wouldn't have
> added "puke". Nate
>
> > i don't understand ur post
> > - but i did laugh when reading it -
> > sorry but i just don't get it
> > mind enlightening me??
> >
> > c
> >
> > --- owen <email suppressed> wrote:
> >
> >> So you're saying there was a filmmaker in the
> room
> >> and an editor in
> >> the room. interesting.
> >> puke.
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at
> <email suppressed>.
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.