From: Jack Sargeant (email suppressed)
Date: Thu Jun 16 2005 - 10:16:31 PDT
oh i do, but i'm not going to write an essay on it here....but in terms
of the debate viz a medium of dissemination i'd say it was the light of
projected film that was seen as important (given some comments earlier
on in the strand).
but maybe i'm of a different generation and thus have different
cultural ref points.
jack
On Thursday, June 16, 2005, at 05:41 pm, Marilyn Brakhage wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure you really DO know "why Stan Brakhage is
> important" -- considering your rather reductive evaluation. But,
> whatever.
>
> MB
>
>
> On Thursday, June 16, 2005, at 08:14 AM, Jack Sargeant wrote:
>
>> I
>> think it's time that we consider other filmmakers who's work
>> experimented with other areas (content, colour etc) and not
>> necessarily
>> the texture of light... wouldn't their work be worth putting onto DVD?
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.
>
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.