From: ifmp (email suppressed)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 12:16:19 PST
RE:
>yes, I agree becuase I don't. for anything to be perfect there must be a
>differentiated state with which its perfection may be contrasted, hence
>disunity, subsequence and qualifiability.-(Ajna-Luxi Lucidus-a-um)
--------------
I meant the films/videos having a _correspondence_ to the causes of the
films/videos,,, so I wrote "the perfect result of everything that caused
them". There's quite a lot of allowance for 'imperfection', and more, in
that.
--------------
the perfect films or videos are the
>ones that aren't made.
--------------
Yes, along with all the others!
Steve Bennett
__________________________________________________________________
For info on FrameWorks, contact Pip Chodorov at <email suppressed>.